No, no, no, no, no, no and no. Sorry judges but seriously
how did this novel make it onto the 2013 longlist? I would hope that there was
some heated debate about including it, otherwise Robert Macfarlane (Cambridge
AND Oxford), Robert Douglas-Fairhurst (Oxford), Natalie Haynes (The Independent
and The Guardian), Martha Kearney (BBC) and Stuart Kelly (The Scotsman, The
Guardian and The Times) have a bit of explaining to do. Such noble
qualifications and history amongst you and I know reading 151 novels to cut it
down to 13 would be a monumental task but surely you couldn’t have all fallen
asleep when reading this?
Have I said this already? No, no, no, no, no, no and no. The
Man Booker website review says: “In a tiny flat in West London,
sixteen-year-old Marina lives with her emotionally-delicate mother, Laura, and
three ancient Hungarian relatives. Imprisoned by her family’s crushing
expectations and their fierce unEnglish pride, by their strange traditions and
stranger foods, she knows she must escape. But the place she runs to makes her
feel even more of an outsider.” That prĂ©cis actually reads better than the book
itself.
Basically we have the ingredients for a Man Booker novel,
living in a foreign land, ostracised from your homeland but not accepted in the
new but what a mishmash of points to be made: teenage angst, puberty,
sexuality, hidden family secrets, embarrassing family members, mysterious lecherous
older men, public school mores, broken relationships, illness, affairs, lost
fortunes, not fitting in at school, at home, no history, depression, drugs – I
could go on and on and on and on.
The 2011 Longlist featured a novel “A Cupboard Full of
Coats” by Yvette Edwards which featured Jinx of who I said “a more selfish,
passionately self-absorbed character I don’t think I’ve ever met”, well this
year I may have stumbled across another – Laura, the mother of Marina, who has
more meltdowns, tears, selfish moments than her teenage lost insecure emotional
daughter but only marginally so.
Kisses can grow. They spread over
your skin like lichen while, inside, you change too. You can’t stop thinking:
what did it mean?
Our novel switches throughout each chapter from Laura being
our protagonist to Marina taking the stage (and I’m sure the chapter breaks are
only there so you can have a rest, even though they are marked with dates they
seem totally irrelevant). If that’s not frustrating enough both characters are
equally unappealing. The “overbearing, secret” Hungarian in-laws are sketched
characters with no depth (suppose they need to be as they’re so secretive) so
you feel no passion at all for them and to simply start blurting out history at
the end of the novel gave me no satisfaction as I couldn’t care less what had
happened to these self-absorbed characters. How on earth have they lived
together for 17 odd years and not discussed anything beyond undergarments and
food?
There are not many novels that I utterly dislike on these
literary longlists but this one surely qualifies. I’d made it 100 pages in and
thought, “this has got to improve to make the longlist” once I was 200 pages
down I wasn’t going to let it get the better of me, 300 pages in and I needed a
break, finally the lot was conquered and I’ve wasted a week’s reading, a week
I’ll never get back. Normally I’m a little less harsh on these novels (the last
three that I’ve reviewed that I didn’t like were from first time authors so I
went a little lighter), here there is no excuse. I don’t blame the writer, nor
the publisher as I’m sure there is an audience for this type of novel out there
(somewhere) but Man Booker judges hang your heads in shame, this is NOT adding
to diversity, yes you may be “independent of fashion” but surely one other of
the 138 novels that didn’t make the list would have been more worthy.
If this makes the shortlist I’ll donate $100 to the
Indigenous Literary Foundation to help a local aborigine community in their
pursuit of reading, let’s just hope their library doesn’t include this novel.
4 comments:
I totally agree, what a waste of time. The plot was convoluted and so flimsy and the ending fell completely flat. Neither of the lead characters was at all believable but I kept reading just to see what other rubbish and justification for ridiculous actions would be thrown in. Booker judges must be mad.
Thanks Sheryl, it is encouraging to see other people with similar thoughts. I thought I was a lone wolf there for a while.
We have just chosen this for our book club. I have been a member for about 10 years and this is the first book I have really disliked. Both the main characters are always interrupted, are people usually so rude? I could not read it, so skipped to the end to find out it was just the same. No wonder Peter disappeared off somewhere.
Thanks for stopping by Jill, and for leaving a comment. I'm glad people agree with my view on this work as it is a struggle to write a bad review when I come across books I don't like. It is heartening when people also dislike the book. Such a pity your book club chose this one, I'm hoping the club's next choice is a lot better.
Post a Comment